State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Chetan Ramesh Kohale — 36/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG140000902026
Filing Number
84/2026
Filing Date
16-02-2026
Registration No
36/2026
Registration Date
16-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni
Judge
14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Decision Date
09th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
36
Police Station
Parshioni
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Chetan Ramesh Kohale
Hearing History
Judge: 14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Disposed
Lok-Nyayalaya
Lok-Nyayalaya
Lok-Nyayalaya
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-03-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
| 16-02-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
| 16-02-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Chetan Ramesh Kohale (SCC No. 36/2026) The Judicial Magistrate convicted 22-year-old Chetan Ramesh Kohale under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his vehicle (MH-40-N-4735) in an obstructive manner on a public way near Tahsildar's Office, Parseoni on 02/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty and requested leniency, citing financial hardship. The court accepted the guilty plea and imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default), noting the minor nature of the offense and the accused's clean criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Chetan Ramesh Kohale (SCC No. 36/2026) The Judicial Magistrate convicted 22-year-old Chetan Ramesh Kohale under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his vehicle (MH-40-N-4735) in an obstructive manner on a public way near Tahsildar's Office, Parseoni on 02/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty and requested leniency, citing financial hardship. The court accepted the guilty plea and imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default), noting the minor nature of the offense and the accused's clean criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts