State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Shubham Dhanrajji Kavde — 34/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG140000882026
Filing Number
82/2026
Filing Date
16-Feb-2026
Registration No
34/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni
Judge
14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
33
Police Station
Parshioni
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shubham Dhanrajji Kavde
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: State v. Shubham Dhanrajji Kavde (34/2026) The Judicial Magistrate convicted Shubham Dhanrajji Kavde under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his vehicle at Pipeline Chowk, Saoner Road, Parseoni (Nagpur) on 02/02/2026 in a manner obstructing public navigation. The accused pleaded guilty and was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 400, with one day simple imprisonment in default, considering his lack of prior criminal record and financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2026
Lok-Nyayalaya
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
-
16-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 34/2026
Case Summary: State v. Shubham Dhanrajji Kavde (34/2026) The Judicial Magistrate convicted Shubham Dhanrajji Kavde under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his vehicle at Pipeline Chowk, Saoner Road, Parseoni (Nagpur) on 02/02/2026 in a manner obstructing public navigation. The accused pleaded guilty and was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 400, with one day simple imprisonment in default, considering his lack of prior criminal record and financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts