Meena Waman Sonekar vs Madan Rawan Hiware Advocate - N.P.Bagde — 320/2017
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 28th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG130031882015
Next Hearing
28th May 2026
Filing Number
501/2017
Filing Date
18-05-2017
Registration No
320/2017
Registration Date
20-05-2017
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Meena Waman Sonekar
Adv. P.B.Bante
Respondent(s)
Madan Rawan Hiware Advocate - N.P.Bagde
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 26-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 05-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a civil court order (S.P.O. No. 320/2017) from the Ramtek Court involving Mimina v. Madan, decided on 15/02/2024. The court allowed the plaintiff's petition, accepting her sworn statements and evidence regarding financial disputes and property matters with the defendant Arun Chavan, including claims related to loans, home construction expenses, and dowry amounts totaling approximately Rs. 1,60,000. The court found the plaintiff's testimony credible and rejected the defendant's counter-arguments, directing appropriate remedies on the disputed financial transactions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a civil court order (S.P.O. No. 320/2017) from the Ramtek Court involving Mimina v. Madan, decided on 15/02/2024. The court allowed the plaintiff's petition, accepting her sworn statements and evidence regarding financial disputes and property matters with the defendant Arun Chavan, including claims related to loans, home construction expenses, and dowry amounts totaling approximately Rs. 1,60,000. The court found the plaintiff's testimony credible and rejected the defendant's counter-arguments, directing appropriate remedies on the disputed financial transactions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts