Maharashtra State vs Mohammad Rijwan Ikawal Ahamd — 1681/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG130027632025
Filing Number
2226/2025
Filing Date
26-Nov-2025
Registration No
1681/2025
Registration Date
26-Nov-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
561
Police Station
Deolapar
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Maharashtra State
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mohammad Rijwan Ikawal Ahamd
-
2.Mohammad Saleam Mohammad Shafi Ansari
-
3.Mohammad Babbu fur Salim Mohammad Afajal Ansari
-
4.Mohammad Jakir Husain Mohammad Kadar Husain
-
5.Mohammad Mobin Akhtar Mohammad Siddique Ansari
-
6.Mohammad Mukhtar Mohammad Samsuddin Ansari
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: State v. Mohammad Rijwan & Others (1681/2025) The court convicted all six accused under Section 12(a) of the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act after they voluntarily pleaded guilty to illegal gambling on November 16, 2025. Each accused was sentenced to imprisonment till rising of court and fined Rs. 300 (with 2 days simple imprisonment as default), with the seized Rs. 2,100 forfeited to the State and gambling articles destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
13-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1681/2025
Case Summary: State v. Mohammad Rijwan & Others (1681/2025) The court convicted all six accused under Section 12(a) of the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act after they voluntarily pleaded guilty to illegal gambling on November 16, 2025. Each accused was sentenced to imprisonment till rising of court and fined Rs. 300 (with 2 days simple imprisonment as default), with the seized Rs. 2,100 forfeited to the State and gambling articles destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts