Maharashtra State vs Manohar Bhivrao Meshram — 1612/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 02nd June 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG130026412025
Filing Number
2141/2025
Filing Date
14-11-2025
Registration No
1612/2025
Registration Date
14-11-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
02nd June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
449
Police Station
Deolapar
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Maharashtra State
Respondent(s)
Manohar Bhivrao Meshram
Rajendra Gendlal Deharval
Ramkumar Shriram Deharval
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
Disposed
First Order
First Order
First Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-05-2026 | First Order |
| 14-03-2026 | First Order |
| 13-12-2025 | First Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ramtek convicted accused Manohar Bhivrao Meshram under Section 12 of the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act for illegal gaming and possession of Rs. 1,155 and Satta Patti papers on 14/09/2025. The court sentenced him to imprisonment till rising of court and a fine of Rs. 300 (or 5 days simple imprisonment in default), considering his guilty plea, first-time offense, poor economic status, and age. The seized cash was credited to the State Government and the matter was disposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ramtek convicted accused Manohar Bhivrao Meshram under Section 12 of the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act for illegal gaming and possession of Rs. 1,155 and Satta Patti papers on 14/09/2025. The court sentenced him to imprisonment till rising of court and a fine of Rs. 300 (or 5 days simple imprisonment in default), considering his guilty plea, first-time offense, poor economic status, and age. The seized cash was credited to the State Government and the matter was disposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts