Milind Motiram Pantawane vs Rajkumar Bagwan Kadbe Advocate - Raman Bharat Gajbhiye — 70/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39,Rule1and2,S.151. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 25-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHNG130019072025

e-Filing Number

05-08-2025

Filing Number

370/2025

Filing Date

06-Aug-2025

Registration No

70/2025

Registration Date

06-Aug-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 39,Rule1and2,S.151

Petitioner(s)

1.Milind Motiram Pantawane

Adv. BANTE PRAMOD BHAURAO
2.Anil Motiram Pantawane

Adv. Raman Bharat Gajbhiye
3.Sunil Motiram Pantawane

Adv. BANTE PRAMOD BHAURAO

Respondent(s)

1.Rajkumar Bagwan Kadbe Advocate - Raman Bharat Gajbhiye
2.Pradip Bagwan Kadbe

Adv. Raman Bharat Gajbhiye
3.Rama Arun Gharde

Adv. Ex-parte
4.Gangasagar Bagwan Kadbe

Adv. Raman Bharat Gajbhiye

Case History

25-Jun-2026

Next hearingPending
23-Apr-2026

Evidence

2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
24-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Case Summary: Milind Vs. Rajkumar (RCS No.70/2025) Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction. The judge found that plaintiffs failed to establish a clear prima facie case, balance of convenience in their favor, or irreparable loss. Citing long-standing pathway usage by defendants and a Tahsildar's operative order recognizing the pathway right, the court held that greater hardship would be caused to defendants if the injunction were granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
24-Mar-2026

Issues

2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
12-Mar-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
10-Mar-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
05-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
05-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
05-Mar-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
26-Feb-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
26-Feb-2026

Reply/Say

2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
12-Feb-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
12-Feb-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
12-Feb-2026

Reply/Say

2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
05-Feb-2026

Reply/Say

2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
15-Jan-2026

Awaiting Notice

2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
23-Dec-2025

Awaiting Notice

2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
11-Dec-2025

Order on ExhibitView PDF
11-Dec-2025

Order on Exhibit
11-Dec-2025

Order on ExhibitView PDF
11-Dec-2025

Order on ExhibitView PDF
11-Dec-2025

Order on ExhibitView PDF
11-Dec-2025

Awaiting Notice

2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
04-Dec-2025

Hearing

2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
20-Nov-2025

Hearing

2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
30-Oct-2025

Order on ExhibitView PDF
30-Oct-2025

Order on ExhibitView PDF
30-Oct-2025

Awaiting Notice

2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
16-Oct-2025

Awaiting Notice

2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
18-Sep-2025

Awaiting Notice

2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
07-Aug-2025

Order on ExhibitView PDF
07-Aug-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
06-Aug-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 70/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Milind Vs. Rajkumar (RCS No.70/2025) Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction. The judge found that plaintiffs failed to establish a clear prima facie case, balance of convenience in their favor, or irreparable loss. Citing long-standing pathway usage by defendants and a Tahsildar's operative order recognizing the pathway right, the court held that greater hardship would be caused to defendants if the injunction were granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.