Dayaram Kathoke Dead vs Sub-Divisional Officer Advocate - J. C. Vajani — 9/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order21. Status: Awaiting Notice. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

Awaiting Notice Next hearing 02-Jul-2026

Reg Dkst

CNR: MHNG130017672023

Filing Number

665/2023

Filing Date

06-Apr-2023

Registration No

9/2024

Registration Date

09-Jul-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek

Judge

17-Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dayaram Kathoke Dead

    Adv. A. M. Deole

  2. 2.Laxmibai Dayaram Kathoke 1.a

    Adv. P. N. Kendurkar

  3. 3.Sunil Dayaram Kathoke 1.b

    Adv. P. N. Kendurkar

  4. 4.Anusuya Raju Badule 1.c

    Adv. P. N. Kendurkar

  5. 5.Sharda Gulab Gade 1.d

    Adv. P. N. Kendurkar

  6. 6.Tarabai Dilip Zade 1.e

    Adv. P. N. Kendurkar

  7. 7.Chandrakala Sudhakar Harode 1.f

    Adv. P. N. Kendurkar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sub-Divisional Officer Advocate - J. C. Vajani

  2. 2.Grampanchayat Mahadula

  3. 3.Mahadeo Khandate

  4. 4.Vijay Khandait 3 i

  5. 5.Ambika Khandait 3 ii

  6. 6.Bhushan Mahadeo Khandait 3 iii

  7. 7.Dharani Mahadeo Khandait 3 iv

Case History

  1. 02-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-May-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  10. 18-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Warrant

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  11. 20-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Warrant

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  12. 09-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Warrant

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  13. 11-Sep-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The Civil Judge Senior Division, Ramtek allowed the decree holder's application to condone delay in filing a review application dated 11 September 2025. The decree holder sought correction of an inadvertent error in a previous order where Order XXI Rule-54 was cited instead of Order XXI Rule-32 of the Code of Civil Procedure for issuing an attachment warrant. The court granted the application in the interest of natural justice, noting the reason was just and the judgment debtors filed no reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 11-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Warrant

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  15. 21-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Warrant

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  16. 17-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Warrant

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  17. 19-Jun-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  18. 07-May-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  19. 20-Mar-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  20. 27-Feb-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  21. 22-Jan-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  22. 22-Nov-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  23. 21-Sep-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  24. 04-Sep-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  25. 09-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 06-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Civil Judge Senior Division, Ramtek allowed the decree holder's application to condone delay in filing a review application dated 11 September 2025. The decree holder sought correction of an inadvertent error in a previous order where Order XXI Rule-54 was cited instead of Order XXI Rule-32 of the Code of Civil Procedure for issuing an attachment warrant. The court granted the application in the interest of natural justice, noting the reason was just and the judgment debtors filed no reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case