Rahul Bansilal Rautel vs Maharashtra — 172/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 06th April 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHNG130015532025
e-Filing Number
01-07-2025
Filing Number
1261/2025
Filing Date
10-Jul-2025
Registration No
172/2025
Registration Date
10-Jul-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek
Judge
1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE
Last updated 24-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
00
Police Station
Ramtek
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rahul Bansilal Rautel
Adv. WAHANE SWATI HARICHAND
Respondent(s)
-
1.Maharashtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary The court rejected Rahul's application for interim custody of his seized Motorola mobile phone under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that the mobile constitutes material evidence in Crime No. 676/2024 (involving sections 356(2), 351(2) BNS and IT Act 66(e)), has been sent for digital forensic analysis, and releasing it could compromise the investigation and trial due to the risk of data erasure, modification, or manipulation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Disposed
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
01-Apr-2026
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
30-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
24-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
12-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
27-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
18-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
13-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
10-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
06-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
02-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
22-Jan-2026
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
16-Jan-2026
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
12-Dec-2025
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
04-Dec-2025
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
28-Nov-2025
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
24-Nov-2025
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
19-Nov-2025
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
15-Nov-2025
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
12-Nov-2025
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
06-Nov-2025
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
30-Oct-2025
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
17-Oct-2025
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
15-Oct-2025
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
10-Oct-2025
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
07-Oct-2025
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
03-Oct-2025
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
30-Sep-2025
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
25-Sep-2025
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
18-Sep-2025
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
15-Sep-2025
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
10-Sep-2025
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
03-Sep-2025
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
21-Jul-2025
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
17-Jul-2025
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
11-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 172/2025
Summary The court rejected Rahul's application for interim custody of his seized Motorola mobile phone under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that the mobile constitutes material evidence in Crime No. 676/2024 (involving sections 356(2), 351(2) BNS and IT Act 66(e)), has been sent for digital forensic analysis, and releasing it could compromise the investigation and trial due to the risk of data erasure, modification, or manipulation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts