Yeshwant So Mahadeo Shivenkar vs The State of Maharashtra through Collector Nagpu Advocate - G.E. Moharir — 200107/2005

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 18. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

L.A.R. - Land Ref.

CNR: MHNG130015252023

Filing Number

553/2005

Filing Date

04-Aug-2004

Registration No

200107/2005

Registration Date

22-Feb-2005

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek

Judge

17-Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 18

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Yeshwant So Mahadeo Shivenkar

    Adv. S.M.Kushwaha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra through Collector Nagpu Advocate - G.E. Moharir

  2. 2.The State of Mah. through Collector Nagpur

  3. 3.The Chairman M.S.E.B. Department Mumbai-32

    Adv. G.E. Moharir

  4. 4.The Chairman

    Adv. G.E. Moharir

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The court partially allowed the landowners' reference petition challenging inadequate land acquisition compensation. The court enhanced the compensation rate from Rs. 1,05,750/hectare to Rs. 1,30,000/hectare for irrigated agricultural land, recognizing the land's fertility and permanent canal irrigation advantage. Additionally, the court awarded statutory benefits including 12% annual interest, 30% solatium, and interest at 9-15% per annum on the enhanced compensation amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  9. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  10. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  11. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  12. 15-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  13. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  14. 01-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  15. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  16. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  17. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  18. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  19. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  20. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  21. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  22. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  23. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  24. 31-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  25. 24-Jul-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  26. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  27. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  28. 03-Jul-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  29. 03-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  30. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  31. 08-May-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  32. 24-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  33. 09-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  34. 03-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  35. 13-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  36. 27-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  37. 13-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  38. 06-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  39. 30-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  40. 16-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  41. 02-Jan-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  42. 14-Nov-2024

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  43. 26-Sep-2024

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  44. 29-Aug-2024

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  45. 08-Aug-2024

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  46. 04-Jul-2024

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  47. 13-Jun-2024

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  48. 21-Mar-2024

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  49. 29-Feb-2024

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  50. 15-Feb-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  51. 15-Feb-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  52. 15-Feb-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  53. 15-Feb-2024

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  54. 01-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  55. 25-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  56. 22-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  57. 30-Nov-2023

    Order

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  58. 12-Oct-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  59. 31-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  60. 17-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  61. 28-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  62. 28-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  63. 07-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  64. 03-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  65. 04-Aug-2004

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200107/2005

casestatus.in Summary

The court partially allowed the landowners' reference petition challenging inadequate land acquisition compensation. The court enhanced the compensation rate from Rs. 1,05,750/hectare to Rs. 1,30,000/hectare for irrigated agricultural land, recognizing the land's fertility and permanent canal irrigation advantage. Additionally, the court awarded statutory benefits including 12% annual interest, 30% solatium, and interest at 9-15% per annum on the enhanced compensation amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case