Yeshwant So Mahadeo Shivankar vs The Chairman M.S.E.B. Department Advocate - Gurunath Eknath Moharir — 200106/2005

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 18. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

L.A.R. - Land Ref.

CNR: MHNG130015192023

Filing Number

550/2005

Filing Date

04-Aug-2004

Registration No

200106/2005

Registration Date

22-Feb-2005

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek

Judge

17-Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 18

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Yeshwant So Mahadeo Shivankar

    Adv. S.M.Kushwaha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Chairman M.S.E.B. Department Advocate - Gurunath Eknath Moharir

  2. 2.The State of Mah. through Collector Nagpur

  3. 3.The Spl. Land Acquisition Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Civil Judge Senior Division, Ramtek partially allowed the land acquisition reference petition filed by five agricultural landowners (Shivankar brothers) challenging inadequate compensation for 1.65 hectares of irrigated land acquired for a thermal power station's ash bund. The court found the original compensation of Rs. 1,05,750/- per hectare grossly inadequate and enhanced it to Rs. 1,30,000/- per hectare based on the land's irrigation advantage and parity with comparable earlier cases, plus statutory solatium (30%), additional component (12% p.a.), and interest (9-15% p.a.). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  9. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  10. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  11. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  12. 15-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  13. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  14. 01-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  15. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  16. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  17. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  18. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  19. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  20. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  21. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  22. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  23. 31-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  24. 24-Jul-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  25. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  26. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  27. 03-Jul-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  28. 03-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  29. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  30. 08-May-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  31. 24-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  32. 09-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  33. 03-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  34. 13-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  35. 27-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  36. 20-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  37. 06-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  38. 30-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  39. 16-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  40. 02-Jan-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  41. 14-Nov-2024

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  42. 26-Sep-2024

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  43. 05-Sep-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  44. 05-Sep-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  45. 05-Sep-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  46. 05-Sep-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  47. 05-Sep-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  48. 05-Sep-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  49. 05-Sep-2024

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  50. 29-Aug-2024

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  51. 08-Aug-2024

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  52. 04-Jul-2024

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  53. 13-Jun-2024

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  54. 18-Apr-2024

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  55. 21-Mar-2024

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  56. 29-Feb-2024

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  57. 25-Jan-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  58. 30-Nov-2023

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  59. 05-Oct-2023

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  60. 31-Aug-2023

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  61. 27-Jul-2023

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  62. 06-Jul-2023

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  63. 20-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  64. 08-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  65. 03-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  66. 04-Aug-2004

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200106/2005

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Civil Judge Senior Division, Ramtek partially allowed the land acquisition reference petition filed by five agricultural landowners (Shivankar brothers) challenging inadequate compensation for 1.65 hectares of irrigated land acquired for a thermal power station's ash bund. The court found the original compensation of Rs. 1,05,750/- per hectare grossly inadequate and enhanced it to Rs. 1,30,000/- per hectare based on the land's irrigation advantage and parity with comparable earlier cases, plus statutory solatium (30%), additional component (12% p.a.), and interest (9-15% p.a.). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case