Narmdabai M Kushwaha(Legal Heir) vs The Secretary 2 Advocate - G.E.Moharir — 200042/2005

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 18. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

L.A.R. - Land Ref.

CNR: MHNG130015132023

Filing Number

547/2005

Filing Date

18-Jan-2005

Registration No

200042/2005

Registration Date

19-Jan-2005

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek

Judge

17-Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 18

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Narmdabai M Kushwaha(Legal Heir)

    Adv. S.M.Kushwah1.

  2. 2.Rajkumar Madhukar Kushwaha 1.

  3. 3.Munnalal Madhukar Kushuwaha(Legal Heir) 1.2.

  4. 4.Rama Munnalal Kushwaha 1.2.

  5. 5.Kartik Munnalal Kushwaha 1.2.

  6. 6.Kanchan Munnalal Kushwaha 1.

  7. 7.Ramesh Madhukar Kushwaha(Legal Heir) 1.3.

  8. 8.Priti Ramesh Kushwaha 1.3.

  9. 9.Ritu Ramesh Kushwaha 1.3.

  10. 10.Nikhil Ramesh Kushwaha 1.

  11. 11.Santosh Madhukar Kushwaha 1.

  12. 12.Pram Raju Murai 1.

  13. 13.Lata Muhindra Pataliya 1.

  14. 14.Sangeeta Mahesh Moriya

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Secretary 2 Advocate - G.E.Moharir

  2. 2.The State of Maha

    Adv. AGP

  3. 3.The Spl Land Acquisition Officer

  4. 4.Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. Ltd., Through its Exective Engineer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The court partially allowed the applicant's reference petition challenging the inadequate land acquisition compensation. The Civil Judge found that while the original award of Rs. 6,52,680 was grossly insufficient, the applicant failed to prove claims for orange trees and stone bandhis. The court enhanced compensation to include Rs. 75,000 for 50 sweet lemon trees (at Rs. 1,500 each), Rs. 50,000 for two houses (at Rs. 25,000 each), Rs. 10,000 for the well, and Rs. 1,000 for the cattle shed, plus statutory solatium at 30%, additional component at 12% per annum, and interest at 9-15% per annum under the Land Acquisition Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-May-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  4. 11-May-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  5. 11-May-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  6. 11-May-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  7. 11-May-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  8. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  9. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  10. 02-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  11. 24-Mar-2026

    IssuesView PDF

  12. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  13. 12-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  14. 05-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  15. 26-Feb-2026

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  16. 26-Feb-2026

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  17. 12-Feb-2026

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  18. 11-Feb-2026

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  19. 29-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  20. 08-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  21. 10-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  22. 04-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  23. 20-Nov-2025

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  24. 17-Oct-2025

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  25. 03-Oct-2025

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  26. 26-Sep-2025

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  27. 18-Sep-2025

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  28. 28-Aug-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  29. 16-Aug-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  30. 12-Aug-2025

    Order

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  31. 15-Jul-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  32. 24-Jun-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  33. 09-May-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  34. 03-May-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  35. 03-May-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  36. 03-Apr-2025

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  37. 13-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  38. 27-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  39. 13-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  40. 06-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  41. 30-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  42. 16-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  43. 09-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  44. 02-Jan-2025

    No W.S. Order

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  45. 05-Dec-2024

    No W.S. Order

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  46. 07-Nov-2024

    No W.S. Order

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  47. 26-Sep-2024

    No W.S. Order

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  48. 22-Aug-2024

    No W.S. Order

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  49. 11-Jul-2024

    No W.S. Order

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  50. 13-Jun-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  51. 25-Apr-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  52. 14-Mar-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  53. 22-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  54. 01-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  55. 11-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  56. 30-Nov-2023

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  57. 12-Oct-2023

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  58. 31-Aug-2023

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  59. 10-Aug-2023

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  60. 27-Jul-2023

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  61. 06-Jul-2023

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  62. 20-Jun-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  63. 30-Apr-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  64. 15-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  65. 18-Jan-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200042/2005

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court partially allowed the applicant's reference petition challenging the inadequate land acquisition compensation. The Civil Judge found that while the original award of Rs. 6,52,680 was grossly insufficient, the applicant failed to prove claims for orange trees and stone bandhis. The court enhanced compensation to include Rs. 75,000 for 50 sweet lemon trees (at Rs. 1,500 each), Rs. 50,000 for two houses (at Rs. 25,000 each), Rs. 10,000 for the well, and Rs. 1,000 for the cattle shed, plus statutory solatium at 30%, additional component at 12% per annum, and interest at 9-15% per annum under the Land Acquisition Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case