Rajkumar M.Kushwaha vs The Chairman MSEB Dept. 2 Advocate - G.E. Moharir — 200038/2005

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 18. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

L.A.R. - Land Ref.

CNR: MHNG130015112023

Filing Number

546/2005

Filing Date

23-Feb-2004

Registration No

200038/2005

Registration Date

19-Jan-2005

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek

Judge

17-Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 18

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajkumar M.Kushwaha

    Adv. S.M.Kushwah

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Chairman MSEB Dept. 2 Advocate - G.E. Moharir

  2. 2.The State of Maharashtra

  3. 3.The Spl. Land Acquisition Officer

  4. 4.Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. Ltd. Through its Executive Engineer(Civil)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The court partly allowed the applicant's reference petition for enhanced land acquisition compensation. The court determined that while the original award of Rs. 4,95,037 was inadequate, it awarded enhanced compensation of Rs. 6,00,000 for 400 orange trees at Rs. 1,500 each, Rs. 12,000 for 6 tamarind trees at Rs. 2,000 each, and Rs. 10,000 for the tube well, plus statutory benefits including 12% additional component, 30% solatium, and interest at prescribed rates, rejecting claims for separate land valuation and stone bandhis due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-May-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  4. 11-May-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  5. 11-May-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  6. 16-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  7. 09-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  8. 02-Apr-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  9. 02-Apr-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  10. 02-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  11. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  12. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  13. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  14. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  15. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  16. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  17. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  18. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  19. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  20. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  21. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  22. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  23. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  24. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  25. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  26. 31-Jul-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  27. 31-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  28. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  29. 17-Jul-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  30. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  31. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  32. 24-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  33. 09-Apr-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  34. 09-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  35. 03-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  36. 13-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  37. 27-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  38. 13-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  39. 06-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  40. 30-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  41. 16-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  42. 09-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  43. 02-Jan-2025

    No W.S. Order

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  44. 05-Dec-2024

    No W.S. Order

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  45. 07-Nov-2024

    No W.S. Order

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  46. 26-Sep-2024

    No W.S. Order

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  47. 22-Aug-2024

    No W.S. Order

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  48. 11-Jul-2024

    No W.S. Order

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  49. 13-Jun-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  50. 25-Apr-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  51. 14-Mar-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  52. 22-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  53. 01-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  54. 11-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  55. 30-Nov-2023

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  56. 12-Oct-2023

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  57. 31-Aug-2023

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  58. 10-Aug-2023

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  59. 27-Jul-2023

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  60. 06-Jul-2023

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  61. 20-Jun-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  62. 30-Apr-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  63. 15-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  64. 23-Feb-2004

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200038/2005

casestatus.in Summary

The court partly allowed the applicant's reference petition for enhanced land acquisition compensation. The court determined that while the original award of Rs. 4,95,037 was inadequate, it awarded enhanced compensation of Rs. 6,00,000 for 400 orange trees at Rs. 1,500 each, Rs. 12,000 for 6 tamarind trees at Rs. 2,000 each, and Rs. 10,000 for the tube well, plus statutory benefits including 12% additional component, 30% solatium, and interest at prescribed rates, rejecting claims for separate land valuation and stone bandhis due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case