Mallavarapu Sesharatnam vs The Chairman MSEB Advocate - G.E. Moharir — 200094/2005

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 18. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

L.A.R. - Land Ref.

CNR: MHNG130014732023

Filing Number

527/2005

Filing Date

08-Jul-2004

Registration No

200094/2005

Registration Date

11-Feb-2005

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek

Judge

17-Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 18

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mallavarapu Sesharatnam

    Adv. S.M.Kushwah

  2. 2.Venketlaxmi Apparao

    Adv. Kushava

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Chairman MSEB Advocate - G.E. Moharir

  2. 2.State of Maharashtra

  3. 3.Spl. L.A.O

  4. 4.Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. Ltd. Through Executive Engineer

    Adv. G.E. Moharir

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Civil Judge, Ramtek, partially allowed the applicants' land acquisition reference petition, enhancing compensation from Rs. 1,05,750/- to Rs. 1,30,000/- per hectare for irrigated agricultural land acquired for a thermal power station. The court found the original award inadequate and applied the principle of parity with similar cases, awarding an additional premium for the land's permanent canal irrigation advantage. The applicants were also granted statutory benefits including 12% annual additional component, 30% solatium, and interest at 9% (first year) and 15% (thereafter) under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  10. 15-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  11. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  12. 01-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  13. 10-Dec-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  14. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  15. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  16. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  17. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  18. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  19. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  20. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  21. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  22. 31-Jul-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  23. 31-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  24. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  25. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  26. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  27. 24-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  28. 09-Apr-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  29. 09-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  30. 03-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  31. 27-Mar-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  32. 27-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  33. 06-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  34. 27-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  35. 13-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  36. 16-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  37. 09-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  38. 02-Jan-2025

    No W.S. Order

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  39. 05-Dec-2024

    No W.S. Order

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  40. 07-Nov-2024

    No W.S. Order

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  41. 26-Sep-2024

    No W.S. Order

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  42. 29-Aug-2024

    No W.S. Order

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  43. 25-Jul-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  44. 13-Jun-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  45. 21-Mar-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  46. 29-Feb-2024

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  47. 25-Jan-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  48. 30-Nov-2023

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  49. 05-Oct-2023

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  50. 31-Aug-2023

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  51. 27-Jul-2023

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  52. 06-Jul-2023

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  53. 21-Jun-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  54. 03-May-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  55. 06-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  56. 08-Jul-2004

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200094/2005

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Civil Judge, Ramtek, partially allowed the applicants' land acquisition reference petition, enhancing compensation from Rs. 1,05,750/- to Rs. 1,30,000/- per hectare for irrigated agricultural land acquired for a thermal power station. The court found the original award inadequate and applied the principle of parity with similar cases, awarding an additional premium for the land's permanent canal irrigation advantage. The applicants were also granted statutory benefits including 12% annual additional component, 30% solatium, and interest at 9% (first year) and 15% (thereafter) under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case