Vimlabai S Dhurve vs The Chairman 2 Advocate - G.E. Moharir — 200174/2005
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 18. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 30th March 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Ref.
CNR: MHNG130009272023
Filing Number
268/2005
Filing Date
09-Jun-2005
Registration No
200174/2005
Registration Date
10-Jun-2005
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek
Judge
17-Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 24-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vimlabai S Dhurve
Adv. S.M.Kushwah
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Chairman 2 Advocate - G.E. Moharir
-
2.The State of Maharashtra
-
3.The Spl. Land Acquisition Officer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Civil Judge Senior Division, Ramtek partly allowed the land acquisition reference and enhanced the compensation for 1.60 hectares of irrigated agricultural land from Rs. 1,05,750/hectare to Rs. 1,30,000/hectare, recognizing the land's canal irrigation advantage and applying parity with similar neighboring cases. The court also awarded 12% annual additional component, 30% solatium, and interest at 9% (first year) and 15% thereafter on the enhanced amount, while rejecting claims for stone-bandhi compensation and claims unsupported by evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
24-Mar-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
Judgment
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
12-Mar-2026
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
24-Feb-2026
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
11-Feb-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
29-Jan-2026
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
15-Jan-2026
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
11-Dec-2025
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
27-Nov-2025
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
30-Oct-2025
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
09-Oct-2025
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
18-Sep-2025
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
28-Aug-2025
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
14-Aug-2025
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
31-Jul-2025
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
24-Jul-2025
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
17-Jul-2025
Compliance
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
03-Jul-2025
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
19-Jun-2025
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
08-May-2025
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
24-Apr-2025
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
27-Mar-2025
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
06-Mar-2025
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
20-Feb-2025
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
16-Jan-2025
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
02-Jan-2025
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
14-Nov-2024
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
26-Sep-2024
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
29-Aug-2024
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
25-Jul-2024
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
13-Jun-2024
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
21-Mar-2024
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
29-Feb-2024
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
25-Jan-2024
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
30-Nov-2023
Steps
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
05-Oct-2023
Steps
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
31-Aug-2023
Steps
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
27-Jul-2023
Steps
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
07-Jun-2023
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
27-Apr-2023
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
31-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jun-2005
Case filed
Registration No. 200174/2005
The Civil Judge Senior Division, Ramtek partly allowed the land acquisition reference and enhanced the compensation for 1.60 hectares of irrigated agricultural land from Rs. 1,05,750/hectare to Rs. 1,30,000/hectare, recognizing the land's canal irrigation advantage and applying parity with similar neighboring cases. The court also awarded 12% annual additional component, 30% solatium, and interest at 9% (first year) and 15% thereafter on the enhanced amount, while rejecting claims for stone-bandhi compensation and claims unsupported by evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts