Mohd Hafiz vs The Chariman 2 Advocate - G.E. Moharir — 200064/2005

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 18. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

L.A.R. - Land Ref.

CNR: MHNG130007112023

Filing Number

170/2005

Filing Date

04-Jun-2004

Registration No

200064/2005

Registration Date

01-Feb-2005

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek

Judge

17-Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 18

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mohd Hafiz

    Adv. S.M.Kushwaha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Chariman 2 Advocate - G.E. Moharir

  2. 2.State of Maha.

  3. 3.Spl. L.A.O.

  4. 4.Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. Ltd.,Through its Executive Engineer(Civil)

    Adv. G.E. Moharir

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Civil Judge Senior Division, Ramtek partly allowed the land acquisition reference petition filed by Mohd. Hafiz, enhancing the compensation for his 0.69 hectares of irrigated agricultural land from Rs. 1,05,750/hectare to Rs. 1,30,000/hectare. The court found the original award inadequate, applying the principle of parity with comparable cases while recognizing the land's superior irrigation advantages through permanent canal access. Additionally, the applicant was awarded 12% annual interest, 30% solatium, and 9-15% post-award interest on the enhanced compensation amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  9. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  10. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  11. 15-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  12. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  13. 01-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  14. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  15. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  16. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  17. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  18. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  19. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  20. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  21. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  22. 31-Jul-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  23. 31-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  24. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  25. 17-Jul-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  26. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  27. 03-Jul-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  28. 03-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  29. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  30. 08-May-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  31. 24-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  32. 27-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  33. 06-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  34. 20-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  35. 16-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  36. 09-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  37. 02-Jan-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  38. 28-Nov-2024

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  39. 17-Oct-2024

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  40. 03-Oct-2024

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  41. 22-Aug-2024

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  42. 18-Jul-2024

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  43. 13-Jun-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  44. 18-Apr-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  45. 07-Mar-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  46. 18-Jan-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  47. 23-Nov-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  48. 05-Oct-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  49. 24-Aug-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  50. 27-Jul-2023

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  51. 06-Jul-2023

    Steps

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  52. 20-Jun-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  53. 30-Apr-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

  54. 15-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  55. 04-Jun-2004

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200064/2005

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Civil Judge Senior Division, Ramtek partly allowed the land acquisition reference petition filed by Mohd. Hafiz, enhancing the compensation for his 0.69 hectares of irrigated agricultural land from Rs. 1,05,750/hectare to Rs. 1,30,000/hectare. The court found the original award inadequate, applying the principle of parity with comparable cases while recognizing the land's superior irrigation advantages through permanent canal access. Additionally, the applicant was awarded 12% annual interest, 30% solatium, and 9-15% post-award interest on the enhanced compensation amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case