Maharashtra State vs Dyaneshwar Diwalu Pachare — 460/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG130006822026

Filing Number

563/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

460/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek

Judge

1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

133

Police Station

Ramtek

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maharashtra State

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dyaneshwar Diwalu Pachare

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary The court convicted Dhyaneshwar Divalu Pachare under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for causing danger and obstruction to public traffic by operating his vehicle (MH-40-CT-7898) recklessly on a public road on 07/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty in absentia through special summons, and the Judicial Magistrate sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with one day simple imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-May-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 460/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court convicted Dhyaneshwar Divalu Pachare under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for causing danger and obstruction to public traffic by operating his vehicle (MH-40-CT-7898) recklessly on a public road on 07/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty in absentia through special summons, and the Judicial Magistrate sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with one day simple imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case