The State of Maharashtra vs Satyanarayan Marshetti Advocate - A.V. Gajbhiye — 1400092/2014
Case under Wild Life (Protection) Act Section 9,39,50. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHNG130006782014
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
1401511/2014
Filing Date
20-09-2014
Registration No
1400092/2014
Registration Date
20-09-2014
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
FIR Details
FIR Number
96/2
Police Station
Ramtek
Year
2012
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Satyanarayan Marshetti Advocate - A.V. Gajbhiye
Ratan Biranwar
Adv. A.V.Gajbhiye
Mahadeo Lilhare
Adv. A.V.Gajbhiye
Kewlal Lilhare
Adv. A.V.Gajbhiye
Ranglal Uprade
Adv. A.V.Gajbhiye
Anand Nagpure
Adv. A.V.Gajbhiye
Reva Nagpure
Adv. A.V.Gajbhiye
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 24-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 03-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary In this criminal case (FIR No. 1400092/2014) heard by the First Class Magistrate Court in Ramtek, the court completed the counter-investigation (उलटतपास) proceedings. The court examined witness statements and determined that counter-investigation accused nos. 3-7 should be accepted as credible. The counter-investigation was completed, and no further investigation was ordered; the case was disposed of accordingly by order dated 16/12/2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary In this criminal case (FIR No. 1400092/2014) heard by the First Class Magistrate Court in Ramtek, the court completed the counter-investigation (उलटतपास) proceedings. The court examined witness statements and determined that counter-investigation accused nos. 3-7 should be accepted as credible. The counter-investigation was completed, and no further investigation was ordered; the case was disposed of accordingly by order dated 16/12/2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts