Maharashtra State vs Durgesh Gajanan Gaydhane — 371/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG130006372026

Filing Number

519/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

371/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek

Judge

1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

144

Police Station

Ramtek

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maharashtra State

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Durgesh Gajanan Gaydhane

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: Case 371/2026 (Maharashtra State v. Durgesh Gajanan Gaydhane) The Judicial Magistrate convicted Durgesh Gajanan Gaidhane under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for rash/negligent use of a vehicle at Panchala Bus Stop, Ramtek on 09/09/2026, causing danger and obstruction to public. The accused pleaded guilty in absentia via special summons, and the court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200, with one day simple imprisonment as default penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-May-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 371/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Case 371/2026 (Maharashtra State v. Durgesh Gajanan Gaydhane) The Judicial Magistrate convicted Durgesh Gajanan Gaidhane under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for rash/negligent use of a vehicle at Panchala Bus Stop, Ramtek on 09/09/2026, causing danger and obstruction to public. The accused pleaded guilty in absentia via special summons, and the court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200, with one day simple imprisonment as default penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case