Muralidhar Dadulal Rahangdale vs The State Of Maharastra — 62/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHNG130005852026

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

479/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

62/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek

Judge

1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 12-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

197

Police Station

Ramtek

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Muralidhar Dadulal Rahangdale

    Adv. WAHANE SWATI HARICHAND

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Maharastra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court allowed the applicant's petition and granted interim custody of his seized Mahindra tractor until trial conclusion, relying on the Supreme Court's landmark decision in Sunderbhai Desai that vehicles should not be kept at police stations unnecessarily. The release was conditional on filing a ₹5,00,000 indemnity bond and restrictions against using the vehicle for crime or creating third-party interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Order

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 62/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the applicant's petition and granted interim custody of his seized Mahindra tractor until trial conclusion, relying on the Supreme Court's landmark decision in Sunderbhai Desai that vehicles should not be kept at police stations unnecessarily. The release was conditional on filing a ₹5,00,000 indemnity bond and restrictions against using the vehicle for crime or creating third-party interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case