Milind Dattatraya Mahajan vs Anil Ravishankar Pandey Advocate - Sailesh Sitani — 22/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39,Rule1and2,S.151. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit

CNR: MHNG130005422026

Hearing

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

e-Filing Number

23-02-2026

Filing Number

102/2026

Filing Date

24-02-2026

Registration No

22/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek

Judge

17-Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 39,Rule1and2,S.151

Petitioner(s)

Milind Dattatraya Mahajan

Adv. DEOLE ARVIND MAHADEO

Anisha Milind Mahajan

Adv. DEOLE ARVIND MAHADEO

Ninad Milind Mahajan

Adv. DEOLE ARVIND MAHADEO

Shikha Ninad Mahajan

Adv. DEOLE ARVIND MAHADEO

Respondent(s)

Anil Ravishankar Pandey Advocate - Sailesh Sitani

Badal Anil Pandey

Adv. Sailesh Sitani

Gagan Anil Pandey

Adv. Sailesh Sitani

Hearing History

Judge: 17-Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek

07-05-2026

Hearing

30-04-2026

Reply/Say

13-04-2026

Reply/Say

27-03-2026

Hearing

25-03-2026

Hearing

Interim Orders

26-02-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: In Special Civil Suit No. 22/2026 (Milind vs. Anil Pande), the Civil Judge Senior Division, Ramtek issued suit summons to the defendant on 26.02.2026, requiring them to appear and file a written statement of defence within 30 days. The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction, finding no urgency, and instead issued notice to the defendant directing them to file their reply as early as possible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Special Civil Suit No. 22/2026 (Milind vs. Anil Pande), the Civil Judge Senior Division, Ramtek issued suit summons to the defendant on 26.02.2026, requiring them to appear and file a written statement of defence within 30 days. The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction, finding no urgency, and instead issued notice to the defendant directing them to file their reply as early as possible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case