Milind Dattatraya Mahajan vs Anil Ravishankar Pandey Advocate - Sailesh Sitani — 22/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39,Rule1and2,S.151. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHNG130005422026
e-Filing Number
23-02-2026
Filing Number
102/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
22/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek
Judge
17-Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
Last updated 12-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Milind Dattatraya Mahajan
Adv. DEOLE ARVIND MAHADEO
-
2.Anisha Milind Mahajan
Adv. DEOLE ARVIND MAHADEO
-
3.Ninad Milind Mahajan
Adv. DEOLE ARVIND MAHADEO
-
4.Shikha Ninad Mahajan
Adv. DEOLE ARVIND MAHADEO
Respondent(s)
-
1.Anil Ravishankar Pandey Advocate - Sailesh Sitani
-
2.Badal Anil Pandey
Adv. Sailesh Sitani
-
3.Gagan Anil Pandey
Adv. Sailesh Sitani
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
30-Apr-2026
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
13-Apr-2026
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
27-Mar-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
20-Mar-2026
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
10-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
26-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: In Special Civil Suit No. 22/2026 (Milind vs. Anil Pande), the Civil Judge Senior Division, Ramtek issued suit summons to the defendant on 26.02.2026, requiring them to appear and file a written statement of defence within 30 days. The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction, finding no urgency, and instead issued notice to the defendant directing them to file their reply as early as possible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 22/2026
Summary: In Special Civil Suit No. 22/2026 (Milind vs. Anil Pande), the Civil Judge Senior Division, Ramtek issued suit summons to the defendant on 26.02.2026, requiring them to appear and file a written statement of defence within 30 days. The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction, finding no urgency, and instead issued notice to the defendant directing them to file their reply as early as possible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts