Maharashtra State vs Ankit Bablu Madavi — 304/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 09th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG130004362026
Filing Number
355/2026
Filing Date
12-Feb-2026
Registration No
304/2026
Registration Date
12-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek
Judge
1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
09-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
85
Police Station
Ramtek
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Maharashtra State
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ankit Bablu Madavi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Maharashtra State v. Ankit Babuji Madavi (304/2026) The Judicial Magistrate convicted 21-year-old driver Ankit Babuji Madavi under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for causing danger and obstruction to public traffic on 02/02/2026 at Mahadula Fata, Ramtek, by operating vehicle MH-40-KR-7398 recklessly on a public road. The accused pleaded guilty in absentia via special summons, and the magistrate convicted him and imposed a fine of Rs. 200, with one day simple imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-May-2026
Disposed
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
22-Apr-2026
Lok-Nyayalaya
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
14-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 304/2026
Case Summary: Maharashtra State v. Ankit Babuji Madavi (304/2026) The Judicial Magistrate convicted 21-year-old driver Ankit Babuji Madavi under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for causing danger and obstruction to public traffic on 02/02/2026 at Mahadula Fata, Ramtek, by operating vehicle MH-40-KR-7398 recklessly on a public road. The accused pleaded guilty in absentia via special summons, and the magistrate convicted him and imposed a fine of Rs. 200, with one day simple imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts