Maharashtra State vs Ravindra Ramesh kadav — 313/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 09th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG130004222026
Filing Number
341/2026
Filing Date
12-Feb-2026
Registration No
313/2026
Registration Date
12-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek
Judge
1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
09-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
121
Police Station
Ramtek
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Maharashtra State
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ravindra Ramesh kadav
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: 313/2026 Maharashtra State v. Ravindra Ramesh Kadaw Ravindra Ramesh Kadaw, a 30-year-old driver, was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for causing danger and obstruction to the public by operating his vehicle (MH-40-BG-3578) on a public road in Ramtek on 05/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty in absentia via Section 229 of BNSS without appearing before the court. The Judicial Magistrate sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with one day simple imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-May-2026
Disposed
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
22-Apr-2026
Lok-Nyayalaya
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
14-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 313/2026
Case Summary: 313/2026 Maharashtra State v. Ravindra Ramesh Kadaw Ravindra Ramesh Kadaw, a 30-year-old driver, was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for causing danger and obstruction to the public by operating his vehicle (MH-40-BG-3578) on a public road in Ramtek on 05/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty in absentia via Section 229 of BNSS without appearing before the court. The Judicial Magistrate sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with one day simple imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts