Maharashtra State vs Shivcharan Chintaman Raut — 315/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG130004172026

Filing Number

336/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

315/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek

Judge

1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

119

Police Station

Ramtek

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maharashtra State

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shivcharan Chintaman Raut

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary of Case 315/2026 (Maharashtra State v. Shivcharan Chintaman Raut): Shivcharan Chintaman Raut, a 50-year-old driver, was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for causing danger and obstruction to the public by using his vehicle (MH-40-CD-6038) on a public road at Mahadula Fata, Ramtek on 05/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty in absentia via special summons, and the Judicial Magistrate convicted him and imposed a fine of Rs. 200, with one day simple imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-May-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 315/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 315/2026 (Maharashtra State v. Shivcharan Chintaman Raut): Shivcharan Chintaman Raut, a 50-year-old driver, was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for causing danger and obstruction to the public by using his vehicle (MH-40-CD-6038) on a public road at Mahadula Fata, Ramtek on 05/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty in absentia via special summons, and the Judicial Magistrate convicted him and imposed a fine of Rs. 200, with one day simple imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case