Maharashtra State vs Shivcharan Chintaman Raut — 315/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 09th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG130004172026
Filing Number
336/2026
Filing Date
11-02-2026
Registration No
315/2026
Registration Date
11-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek
Judge
1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
09th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
FIR Details
FIR Number
119
Police Station
Ramtek
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Maharashtra State
Respondent(s)
Shivcharan Chintaman Raut
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
Disposed
Lok-Nyayalaya
Lok-Nyayalaya
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-04-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
| 14-03-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 315/2026 (Maharashtra State v. Shivcharan Chintaman Raut): Shivcharan Chintaman Raut, a 50-year-old driver, was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for causing danger and obstruction to the public by using his vehicle (MH-40-CD-6038) on a public road at Mahadula Fata, Ramtek on 05/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty in absentia via special summons, and the Judicial Magistrate convicted him and imposed a fine of Rs. 200, with one day simple imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 315/2026 (Maharashtra State v. Shivcharan Chintaman Raut): Shivcharan Chintaman Raut, a 50-year-old driver, was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for causing danger and obstruction to the public by using his vehicle (MH-40-CD-6038) on a public road at Mahadula Fata, Ramtek on 05/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty in absentia via special summons, and the Judicial Magistrate convicted him and imposed a fine of Rs. 200, with one day simple imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts