Shri. Dashrath Kamdi vs Shri. Dhondba Kamdi Advocate - Nil — 9/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Awaiting Notice. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG130001752019
Filing Number
14/2019
Filing Date
11-Feb-2019
Registration No
9/2019
Registration Date
11-Feb-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
Last updated 12-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shri. Dashrath Kamdi
Adv. S.C. Kela
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shri. Dhondba Kamdi Advocate - Nil
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-Apr-2026
Awaiting Notice
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
10-Mar-2026
Awaiting Notice
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
10-Feb-2026
Awaiting Notice
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
13-Jan-2026
Steps
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
02-Dec-2025
Steps
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
07-Oct-2025
Steps
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
02-Sep-2025
Steps
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
22-Jul-2025
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
17-Jun-2025
Evidence
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
22-Apr-2025
Reply/Say
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
25-Mar-2025
Reply/Say
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
18-Feb-2025
Reply/Say
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
14-Jan-2025
Reply/Say
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
17-Dec-2024
Evidence
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
19-Nov-2024
Evidence
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
15-Oct-2024
Evidence
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
24-Sep-2024
Evidence
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
13-Aug-2024
Evidence
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
02-Jul-2024
Evidence
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
30-Apr-2024
Evidence
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
26-Mar-2024
Evidence
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
27-Feb-2024
Evidence
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
30-Jan-2024
Evidence
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
12-Dec-2023
Evidence
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
31-Oct-2023
Evidence
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
26-Sep-2023
Evidence
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
29-Aug-2023
Evidence
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
11-Jul-2023
Evidence
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
06-Jun-2023
Evidence
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
11-Apr-2023
Evidence
3rd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and JMFC, Ramtek
-
28-Feb-2023
Evidence
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
14-Feb-2023
Evidence
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
10-Jan-2023
Issues
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
06-Dec-2022
Issues
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
04-Oct-2022
Issues
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
06-Sep-2022
Issues
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
26-Jul-2022
Issues
-
21-Jun-2022
Issues
-
12-Apr-2022
Issues
-
15-Mar-2022
Issues
-
17-Feb-2022
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The plaintiff's application for police aid to enforce a temporary injunction order (dated 05-10-2021) restraining the defendant from construction on disputed property was rejected. The court held that police assistance is an extreme measure requiring proof of grave emergency and apprehension of violence, which the plaintiff failed to establish. The court found the application premature, noting the plaintiff had not exhausted alternative remedies available under the injunction order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Feb-2022
Issues
-
15-Feb-2022
Issues
-
08-Feb-2022
Issues
-
11-Jan-2022
Issues
-
07-Dec-2021
Hearing
-
09-Nov-2021
Hearing
-
05-Oct-2021
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
05-Oct-2021
Hearing
-
14-Sep-2021
Hearing
-
31-Aug-2021
Hearing
-
17-Aug-2021
Hearing
-
03-Aug-2021
Hearing
-
13-Jul-2021
Reply/Say
-
08-Jun-2021
Reply/Say
-
04-May-2021
Reply/Say
-
20-Apr-2021
Reply/Say
-
12-Apr-2021
Awaiting Notice
-
07-Apr-2021
Awaiting Notice
-
06-Apr-2021
Awaiting Notice
-
17-Mar-2021
Evidence
-
11-Feb-2021
Evidence
-
07-Jan-2021
Evidence
-
03-Dec-2020
Evidence
-
21-Oct-2020
Issues
-
28-Sep-2020
Issues
-
13-Aug-2020
Issues
-
09-Jul-2020
Issues
-
12-Jun-2020
Issues
-
15-May-2020
Issues
-
30-Apr-2020
Issues
-
30-Mar-2020
Issues
-
24-Feb-2020
Issues
-
17-Jan-2020
Issues
-
11-Dec-2019
Compliance
-
25-Nov-2019
Hearing
-
24-Oct-2019
Hearing
-
30-Sep-2019
Hearing
-
16-Sep-2019
Hearing
-
23-Aug-2019
Hearing
-
08-Aug-2019
Evidence
-
19-Jul-2019
Evidence
-
12-Jul-2019
Evidence
-
03-Jul-2019
Evidence
-
03-Jun-2019
Evidence
-
18-Apr-2019
Evidence
-
08-Apr-2019
Written Statement
-
27-Mar-2019
Written Statement
-
12-Mar-2019
EvidenceView PDF
-
12-Mar-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 9/2019
Summary: The plaintiff's application for police aid to enforce a temporary injunction order (dated 05-10-2021) restraining the defendant from construction on disputed property was rejected. The court held that police assistance is an extreme measure requiring proof of grave emergency and apprehension of violence, which the plaintiff failed to establish. The court found the application premature, noting the plaintiff had not exhausted alternative remedies available under the injunction order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts