Gali Vyankat Alias Venkata Sai Yashwantraj vs Rajkumar Hiraman Patil Advocate - SONWANE SWAPNIL SUBHASH — 17/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order39,151. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHNG130001392025
e-Filing Number
21-01-2025
Filing Number
49/2025
Filing Date
21-Jan-2025
Registration No
17/2025
Registration Date
21-Jan-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek
Judge
17-Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
Last updated 24-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Gali Vyankat Alias Venkata Sai Yashwantraj
Adv. A.G. Mahajan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rajkumar Hiraman Patil Advocate - SONWANE SWAPNIL SUBHASH
-
2.Dilip Hiraman Patil
-
3.Ravindra Hiraman Patil
Adv. A.V. Gajbhiye
-
4.Shashikala Tulsidas Patil
-
5.Pragati Sachin Bhagat
-
6.Swati Kirtikumar Khobragade
Case History
-
08-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Mar-2026
Order on T.I.View PDF
SUMMARY The Civil Judge Senior Division at Ramtek allowed the plaintiff's application for interim injunction under Order 39 Rule 1(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court restrained the defendants from alienating 0.81 hectares of agricultural land (Survey No. 21/1) to any third party until final disposal of the suit seeking specific performance of a sale agreement dated June 10, 2022. The court found that the plaintiff had a prima facie case, the balance of convenience favored him, and he would suffer irreparable loss if the relief was denied, as the defendants had failed to execute the sale deed despite accepting earnest money of Rs. 8 lakhs and initially delivering possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
12-Mar-2026
Order
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
06-Mar-2026
Order
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
26-Feb-2026
Order
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
18-Feb-2026
Order
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
04-Feb-2026
Order
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
28-Jan-2026
Order
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
20-Jan-2026
Order
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
14-Jan-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
17-Dec-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
10-Dec-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
18-Nov-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
18-Nov-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
31-Oct-2025
Ex-Parte Order
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
08-Oct-2025
Ex-Parte Order
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
23-Sep-2025
Ex-Parte Order
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
13-Aug-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
07-Jul-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
25-Jun-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
25-Jun-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
11-Jun-2025
Order
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
06-May-2025
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
24-Apr-2025
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
15-Apr-2025
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
06-Mar-2025
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
07-Feb-2025
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
21-Jan-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
21-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 17/2025
SUMMARY The Civil Judge Senior Division at Ramtek allowed the plaintiff's application for interim injunction under Order 39 Rule 1(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court restrained the defendants from alienating 0.81 hectares of agricultural land (Survey No. 21/1) to any third party until final disposal of the suit seeking specific performance of a sale agreement dated June 10, 2022. The court found that the plaintiff had a prima facie case, the balance of convenience favored him, and he would suffer irreparable loss if the relief was denied, as the defendants had failed to execute the sale deed despite accepting earnest money of Rs. 8 lakhs and initially delivering possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts