Shri Saurabh Rajkumar Raut vs Shri Anil S/o Rangrao Sawarkar Advocate - Reena N Ganvir — 6/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHNG130001272026
e-Filing Number
16-01-2026
Filing Number
31/2026
Filing Date
17-Jan-2026
Registration No
6/2026
Registration Date
17-Jan-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek
Judge
17-Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
Last updated 12-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shri Saurabh Rajkumar Raut
Adv. RAFIAL JOHN ANTHONY
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shri Anil S/o Rangrao Sawarkar Advocate - Reena N Ganvir
-
2.Shri Dinesh S/o Rangrao Sawarkar
Adv. Reena N Ganvir
-
3.The Tahasildar, Tahasil Office
Case History
-
08-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-May-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
08-Apr-2026
Order
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
24-Mar-2026
Order
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
09-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
19-Jan-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: In Civil Suit No. 6/2026 (Saurabh vs. Anil and others) before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Ramtek, dated 19.01.2026: suit summons were issued to defendants to appear and file a written statement within 30 days, and the application for temporary injunction was rejected as the court found no urgency for ex-parte interim relief. Defendants were directed to file their reply as early as possible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 6/2026
Summary: In Civil Suit No. 6/2026 (Saurabh vs. Anil and others) before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Ramtek, dated 19.01.2026: suit summons were issued to defendants to appear and file a written statement within 30 days, and the application for temporary injunction was rejected as the court found no urgency for ex-parte interim relief. Defendants were directed to file their reply as early as possible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts