Bablu S/o. Mahadeo Yadav vs Ashok S/o. Mahadeo Yadav and 6 Advocate - Adv. Deole — 7/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG130000762023
Filing Number
3/2023
Filing Date
16-Jan-2023
Registration No
7/2023
Registration Date
17-Jan-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek
Judge
1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
Last updated 24-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bablu S/o. Mahadeo Yadav
Adv. M.V. Yerpude
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ashok S/o. Mahadeo Yadav and 6 Advocate - Adv. Deole
-
2.Mr. Umesh S/o. Mahadeo Yadav
-
3.Anita w/o. Birsingh Yadav
-
4.Kammo W/o. Rakesh Yadav
-
5.Babita W/o. Pushpendra Yadav
-
6.Geeta W/o. Ramu Yadav
-
7.Smt. Kalabai Wd/o. Mahadeo Yadav
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-Apr-2026
Defence Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
30-Mar-2026
Defence Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
12-Mar-2026
EvidenceView PDF
Case Summary This is a civil suit (Case No. 7/2023) between Bablu Yadav vs. Ashok Yadav regarding property partition. The court conducted cross-examination of the plaintiff's witness, recording testimony about ancestral agricultural land ownership, inheritance rights, and disputed property shares. The cross-examination has been completed and the case is proceeding on its merits with both parties presenting their evidence regarding land partition claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
19-Dec-2025
EvidenceView PDF
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
27-Nov-2025
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
02-Aug-2025
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
18-Jul-2025
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
13-Jun-2025
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
24-Apr-2025
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
20-Mar-2025
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
13-Feb-2025
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
02-Jan-2025
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
21-Nov-2024
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
16-Oct-2024
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
04-Sep-2024
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
12-Aug-2024
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
24-Jul-2024
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
21-Jun-2024
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
26-Apr-2024
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
30-Mar-2024
Issues
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
23-Feb-2024
Issues
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
19-Jan-2024
Issues
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
18-Dec-2023
Written Statement
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
05-Dec-2023
Written Statement
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
03-Nov-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
03-Nov-2023
Written Statement
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
06-Oct-2023
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
13-Sep-2023
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
18-Aug-2023
Filing of Affidavit
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
15-Jul-2023
Filing of Affidavit
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
19-Jun-2023
Filing of Affidavit
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
09-Jun-2023
Written Statement
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
13-Apr-2023
Written Statement
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
20-Mar-2023
Written Statement
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
22-Feb-2023
Awaiting Summons
-
17-Jan-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 7/2023
Case Summary This is a civil suit (Case No. 7/2023) between Bablu Yadav vs. Ashok Yadav regarding property partition. The court conducted cross-examination of the plaintiff's witness, recording testimony about ancestral agricultural land ownership, inheritance rights, and disputed property shares. The cross-examination has been completed and the case is proceeding on its merits with both parties presenting their evidence regarding land partition claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts