State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Umesh Ramaji Kude — 1359/2025

Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120021152025

e-Filing Number

17-12-2025

Filing Number

1800/2025

Filing Date

17-Dec-2025

Registration No

1359/2025

Registration Date

17-Dec-2025

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

586

Police Station

P.S.Jalalkheda

Year

2025

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Umesh Ramaji Kude

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: S.C.C. No.1359/2025 Umesh Ramaji Kude, age 45, was charged under Section 285 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for an offense occurring on 18/11/2025. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after understanding the charges in Marathi. The court convicted him and, considering his lack of criminal antecedents, poor financial status, and the nature of the offense, imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine or three days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-May-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  5. 17-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1359/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S.C.C. No.1359/2025 Umesh Ramaji Kude, age 45, was charged under Section 285 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for an offense occurring on 18/11/2025. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after understanding the charges in Marathi. The court convicted him and, considering his lack of criminal antecedents, poor financial status, and the nature of the offense, imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine or three days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case