State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Shekhar Ramesh Balpande — 1332/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120020852025
e-Filing Number
12-12-2025
Filing Number
1775/2025
Filing Date
12-12-2025
Registration No
1332/2025
Registration Date
12-12-2025
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
5-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J.M.F.C. Narkhed
Decision Date
09th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
316
Police Station
P.S.Jalalkheda
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda
Respondent(s)
Shekhar Ramesh Balpande
Mohan Ukandrao Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J.M.F.C. Narkhed
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 19-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 13-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 12-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 1332/2025 The Judicial Magistrate convicted both accused, Shekhar Ramesh Balpande and Mohan Ukandrao Patil, for gambling offences under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887, after they voluntarily pleaded guilty. The court sentenced them to simple imprisonment till rising of court and imposed a fine of Rs. 200 each (or 3 days imprisonment in default), taking a lenient view given their poverty and lack of criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 1332/2025 The Judicial Magistrate convicted both accused, Shekhar Ramesh Balpande and Mohan Ukandrao Patil, for gambling offences under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887, after they voluntarily pleaded guilty. The court sentenced them to simple imprisonment till rising of court and imposed a fine of Rs. 200 each (or 3 days imprisonment in default), taking a lenient view given their poverty and lack of criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts