State Government Thorug P.S.O. Narkhed vs Dnyaneshwar Marotrao Umathe — 1252/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 84. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120020012025
Filing Number
1698/2025
Filing Date
08-Dec-2025
Registration No
1252/2025
Registration Date
08-Dec-2025
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government Thorug P.S.O. Narkhed
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dnyaneshwar Marotrao Umathe
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Apr-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 1252/2025 Summary: Dnyaneshwar Marotrao Umathe was convicted under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 for an offence on 13/11/2025. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Narkhed on 14/03/2026. The court, considering his poor financial condition and lack of prior criminal record, imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine, with three days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
03-Feb-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
13-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
08-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1252/2025
Case 1252/2025 Summary: Dnyaneshwar Marotrao Umathe was convicted under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 for an offence on 13/11/2025. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Narkhed on 14/03/2026. The court, considering his poor financial condition and lack of prior criminal record, imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine, with three days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts