State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Sau Janki Mahadev Solanki — 1074/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120019602024
e-Filing Number
19-12-2024
Filing Number
1443/2024
Filing Date
19-12-2024
Registration No
1074/2024
Registration Date
21-12-2024
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
501
Police Station
P.S.Jalalkheda
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda
Respondent(s)
Sau Janki Mahadev Solanki
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 21-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 02-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 20-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 17-07-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Janki Solanki from charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of CrPC/281 of BNSS. The court found that despite summons being issued, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence or file necessary reports (including Chemical Analyzer reports), making case conclusion impossible and warranting closure under the Special Drive initiative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Janki Solanki from charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of CrPC/281 of BNSS. The court found that despite summons being issued, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence or file necessary reports (including Chemical Analyzer reports), making case conclusion impossible and warranting closure under the Special Drive initiative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts