State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Reethesh Laxmanrao Vaiday — 1076/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120017302025
e-Filing Number
03-11-2025
Filing Number
1435/2025
Filing Date
03-Nov-2025
Registration No
1076/2025
Registration Date
04-Nov-2025
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 24-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
620
Police Station
P.S.Narkhed
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed
Respondent(s)
-
1.Reethesh Laxmanrao Vaiday
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court convicted Ritesh Laxmanrao Vaidya under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887, after he pleaded guilty to gambling charges. He was sentenced to simple imprisonment until the rising of court and fined Rs. 200 (with 3 days additional imprisonment in default), with lenient consideration given to his poor financial status and lack of prior criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
12-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
16-Feb-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
02-Feb-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
13-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
04-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1076/2025
The court convicted Ritesh Laxmanrao Vaidya under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887, after he pleaded guilty to gambling charges. He was sentenced to simple imprisonment until the rising of court and fined Rs. 200 (with 3 days additional imprisonment in default), with lenient consideration given to his poor financial status and lack of prior criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts