State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Suresh Santoshrav Parteti — 1068/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120017142025
e-Filing Number
03-11-2025
Filing Number
1419/2025
Filing Date
03-Nov-2025
Registration No
1068/2025
Registration Date
04-Nov-2025
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
601
Police Station
P.S.Narkhed
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed
Respondent(s)
-
1.Suresh Santoshrav Parteti
Case History
-
20-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-May-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
27-Apr-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 1068/2025 Summary: Suresh Santosh Parteti was convicted under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 for an offense committed on 30/09/2025. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Narkhed. Considering his poor financial condition and lack of previous criminal record, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine, with 3 days simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
03-Feb-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
13-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
04-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1068/2025
Case 1068/2025 Summary: Suresh Santosh Parteti was convicted under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 for an offense committed on 30/09/2025. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Narkhed. Considering his poor financial condition and lack of previous criminal record, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine, with 3 days simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts