State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Sandip Shankarrao Gayner Advocate - Adv. U. N. Ghorpade — 701/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12A. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120014232023

Evidence

Next Hearing

20th May 2026

e-Filing Number

04-09-2023

Filing Number

1091/2023

Filing Date

08-11-2023

Registration No

701/2023

Registration Date

09-11-2023

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

5-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J.M.F.C. Narkhed

FIR Details

FIR Number

291

Police Station

P.S.Jalalkheda

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12A

Petitioner(s)

State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda

Respondent(s)

Sandip Shankarrao Gayner Advocate - Adv. U. N. Ghorpade

Hearing History

Judge: 5-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J.M.F.C. Narkhed

15-04-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

10-02-2026

Evidence

03-01-2026

Evidence

13-12-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

10-02-2026
Evidence

This is a witness examination record from a criminal case (State v. Sandip Gayner, Case No. 701/2023) before a Magistrate Court in Narkhhed, Nagpur, Maharashtra. The witness Rameshwar Bapurao Pande gave sworn testimony denying several allegations made by the prosecution regarding his involvement in a panchnama (official inspection record) dated 28/07/2023, and stated he was coerced into signing documents at a bus stop. The defense counsel's cross-examination was rejected, and the court admitted the examination record into evidence with the witness receiving a free copy of the transcript as per Criminal Manual procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a witness examination record from a criminal case (State v. Sandip Gayner, Case No. 701/2023) before a Magistrate Court in Narkhhed, Nagpur, Maharashtra. The witness Rameshwar Bapurao Pande gave sworn testimony denying several allegations made by the prosecution regarding his involvement in a panchnama (official inspection record) dated 28/07/2023, and stated he was coerced into signing documents at a bus stop. The defense counsel's cross-examination was rejected, and the court admitted the examination record into evidence with the witness receiving a free copy of the transcript as per Criminal Manual procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case