State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Roshan Wamanrao Jogekar — 703/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294,323,506. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120013702024
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
e-Filing Number
30-08-2024
Filing Number
949/2024
Filing Date
30-08-2024
Registration No
703/2024
Registration Date
06-09-2024
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
FIR Details
FIR Number
294
Police Station
P.S.Jalalkheda
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda
Respondent(s)
Roshan Wamanrao Jogekar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 21-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 17-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 06-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a criminal case (Case No. 703/2024) involving assault and abusive language. The prosecution witness (husband of the complainant) testified that the accused assaulted his wife, kicked her on the chest, and made death threats on 27.06.2024. During cross-examination, the witness significantly retracted his testimony, admitting he did not witness the incident directly and that his wife told him about it over the phone, while also acknowledging disputes between the families over a savings group (self-help group). The court recorded the examination and cross-examination of the witness on 18.02.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a criminal case (Case No. 703/2024) involving assault and abusive language. The prosecution witness (husband of the complainant) testified that the accused assaulted his wife, kicked her on the chest, and made death threats on 27.06.2024. During cross-examination, the witness significantly retracted his testimony, admitting he did not witness the incident directly and that his wife told him about it over the phone, while also acknowledging disputes between the families over a savings group (self-help group). The court recorded the examination and cross-examination of the witness on 18.02.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts