State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Sanadip Shankar Gayaner Advocate - Adv. U. N. Ghorpade — 619/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120012792024

Evidence

Next Hearing

03rd July 2026

e-Filing Number

17-08-2024

Filing Number

885/2024

Filing Date

17-08-2024

Registration No

619/2024

Registration Date

19-08-2024

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

FIR Details

FIR Number

8

Police Station

P.S.Jalalkheda

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a)

Petitioner(s)

State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda

Respondent(s)

Sanadip Shankar Gayaner Advocate - Adv. U. N. Ghorpade

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

29-04-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

10-02-2026

Evidence

03-01-2026

Evidence

13-12-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

10-02-2026
Evidence

Summary: The court recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of witness Mangesh Manoharlal Jaan in a case against Sandip Gayner before the First Class Magistrate at Narkhed. The witness testified that police did not prepare any panchnama in his presence at the crime scene, though he later signed a document dated 10/01/2024, claiming he was not aware of its contents and signed only under police direction. The defense counsel's request for cross-examination was granted under Section 154 of Indian Evidence Act, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of witness Mangesh Manoharlal Jaan in a case against Sandip Gayner before the First Class Magistrate at Narkhed. The witness testified that police did not prepare any panchnama in his presence at the crime scene, though he later signed a document dated 10/01/2024, claiming he was not aware of its contents and signed only under police direction. The defense counsel's request for cross-examination was granted under Section 154 of Indian Evidence Act, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case