State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Sanadip Shankar Gayaner Advocate - Adv. U. N. Ghorpade — 619/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120012792024
Next Hearing
03rd July 2026
e-Filing Number
17-08-2024
Filing Number
885/2024
Filing Date
17-08-2024
Registration No
619/2024
Registration Date
19-08-2024
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
FIR Details
FIR Number
8
Police Station
P.S.Jalalkheda
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda
Respondent(s)
Sanadip Shankar Gayaner Advocate - Adv. U. N. Ghorpade
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 03-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 13-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of witness Mangesh Manoharlal Jaan in a case against Sandip Gayner before the First Class Magistrate at Narkhed. The witness testified that police did not prepare any panchnama in his presence at the crime scene, though he later signed a document dated 10/01/2024, claiming he was not aware of its contents and signed only under police direction. The defense counsel's request for cross-examination was granted under Section 154 of Indian Evidence Act, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of witness Mangesh Manoharlal Jaan in a case against Sandip Gayner before the First Class Magistrate at Narkhed. The witness testified that police did not prepare any panchnama in his presence at the crime scene, though he later signed a document dated 10/01/2024, claiming he was not aware of its contents and signed only under police direction. The defense counsel's request for cross-examination was granted under Section 154 of Indian Evidence Act, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts