State Excise Department Katol vs Anita Rajesh Pawar — 588/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120012052024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
838/2024
Filing Date
30-07-2024
Registration No
588/2024
Registration Date
30-07-2024
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Excise Department Katol
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Anita Rajesh Pawar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 22-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 28-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 20-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 17-07-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
In Summary Criminal Case No. 588/2024 against Anita Pawar under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, the Judicial Magistrate stopped the proceedings under Section 258 of CrPC/281 of BNSS due to the prosecution's continuous failure to secure the accused's presence despite multiple opportunities and the absence of critical evidence like the Chemical Analyzer report. The accused was discharged from the offense, her bail bond was cancelled, and the case record was filed away as no progress was possible in the near future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In Summary Criminal Case No. 588/2024 against Anita Pawar under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, the Judicial Magistrate stopped the proceedings under Section 258 of CrPC/281 of BNSS due to the prosecution's continuous failure to secure the accused's presence despite multiple opportunities and the absence of critical evidence like the Chemical Analyzer report. The accused was discharged from the offense, her bail bond was cancelled, and the case record was filed away as no progress was possible in the near future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts