State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Satish Shantarao Revatkar — 606/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120011582023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

18-09-2023

Filing Number

943/2023

Filing Date

26-09-2023

Registration No

606/2023

Registration Date

26-09-2023

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

322

Police Station

P.S.Jalalkheda

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda

Respondent(s)

Satish Shantarao Revatkar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

12-03-2026

Disposed

28-01-2026

Awaiting Summons

27-11-2025

Awaiting Summons

30-09-2025

Awaiting Summons

18-07-2025

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court stopped proceedings against accused Satish Revatkar under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code and discharged him from charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, citing continuous absence of the accused and prosecution's failure to secure his presence despite multiple opportunities. The court found no progress in the case since 2023, with missing critical evidence like the Chemical Analyzer report, making it impractical to continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped proceedings against accused Satish Revatkar under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code and discharged him from charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, citing continuous absence of the accused and prosecution's failure to secure his presence despite multiple opportunities. The court found no progress in the case since 2023, with missing critical evidence like the Chemical Analyzer report, making it impractical to continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case