Akshay dnyaneshwar Thote vs Nitin @ Nandu Uttamrao Pethe Advocate - Adv. U. N. Ghorpade — 602/2018
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: N.B.W._Unready. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120011092018
Next Hearing
20th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1011/2018
Filing Date
25-10-2018
Registration No
602/2018
Registration Date
25-10-2018
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Akshay dnyaneshwar Thote
Adv. Adv.M.R.Charde
Respondent(s)
Nitin @ Nandu Uttamrao Pethe Advocate - Adv. U. N. Ghorpade
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | N.B.W._Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | N.B.W._Unready | |
| 30-01-2026 | N.B.W._Unready | |
| 05-12-2025 | N.B.W._Unready | |
| 14-11-2025 | N.B.W._Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: S.C.C.No. 602/2018 — Akshay Vs Nitin The court found prima-facie case against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act for dishonoring a cheque. Summons were issued for the accused's attendance, and the complainant was directed to serve copies of the complaint and documents on the accused. The accused has the option to apply for compounding of the offense at the first or second hearing without costs, or later subject to Supreme Court guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: S.C.C.No. 602/2018 — Akshay Vs Nitin The court found prima-facie case against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act for dishonoring a cheque. Summons were issued for the accused's attendance, and the complainant was directed to serve copies of the complaint and documents on the accused. The accused has the option to apply for compounding of the offense at the first or second hearing without costs, or later subject to Supreme Court guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts