State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Pramila Shankarrao Uikey — 587/2021

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 04th May 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120011022021

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

951/2021

Filing Date

21-10-2021

Registration No

587/2021

Registration Date

21-10-2021

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

213

Police Station

P.S.Narkhed

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(e)
INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 109

Petitioner(s)

State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Pramila Shankarrao Uikey

Pritam Bhaiyyalal Hajare

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

04-05-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Awaiting Warrant

08-01-2026

Evidence

20-12-2025

Evidence

28-10-2025

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

04-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court stopped proceedings against accused Pramila Uikey under Section 258 Cr.P.C./Section 281 B.N.S.S. and discharged her from offenses under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found the case, pending since 2021 (over 5 years old), had stalled due to the accused's continuous absence despite a Non-Bailable Warrant being issued, making it unlikely the case would conclude, thus warranting closure in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped proceedings against accused Pramila Uikey under Section 258 Cr.P.C./Section 281 B.N.S.S. and discharged her from offenses under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found the case, pending since 2021 (over 5 years old), had stalled due to the accused's continuous absence despite a Non-Bailable Warrant being issued, making it unlikely the case would conclude, thus warranting closure in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case