Nirmala Motiram Banait vs Durga Rajesh Banait — 59/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section suitfordecl. Status: Amended Plaint. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG120011002021
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
155/2021
Filing Date
21-10-2021
Registration No
59/2021
Registration Date
21-10-2021
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nirmala Motiram Banait
Adv. Adv. S.A. Lone
Respondent(s)
Durga Rajesh Banait
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Amended Plaint
Amended Plaint
Amended Plaint
Amended Plaint
Amended Plaint
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Amended Plaint |
| 14-03-2026 | Amended Plaint |
| 19-01-2026 | Amended Plaint |
| 13-12-2025 | Amended Plaint |
| 29-09-2025 | Amended Plaint |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 59/2021 (Nirmala Motiram Banait v. Durga Rajesh Banait) The court allowed the defendant's application to file a Written Statement and reply to the temporary injunction application beyond the stipulated 90-day period. The defendant cited technical difficulties in printing and filing the documents. The court found the grounds justified, especially since the plaintiff had not yet adduced evidence, and allowing the defendant to contest would enable a decision on merits. The application was permitted subject to the defendant paying costs of Rs. 200 to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 59/2021 (Nirmala Motiram Banait v. Durga Rajesh Banait) The court allowed the defendant's application to file a Written Statement and reply to the temporary injunction application beyond the stipulated 90-day period. The defendant cited technical difficulties in printing and filing the documents. The court found the grounds justified, especially since the plaintiff had not yet adduced evidence, and allowing the defendant to contest would enable a decision on merits. The application was permitted subject to the defendant paying costs of Rs. 200 to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts