Smt Tarabai Wd/o Ramkisan Rajpur (Thakur) and others vs Ashok Ramkisan Rajput (Thakur) Advocate - Adv. S.A. Lone — 56/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SuitforDecla. Status: Amended Plaint. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG120009372017
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
Filing Number
92/2017
Filing Date
31-10-2017
Registration No
56/2017
Registration Date
31-10-2017
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
5-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J.M.F.C. Narkhed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt Tarabai Wd/o Ramkisan Rajpur (Thakur) and others
Adv. Adv. V. M. Kshirsagar
Respondent(s)
Ashok Ramkisan Rajput (Thakur) Advocate - Adv. S.A. Lone
Smt. Paru alias Parvati Wd/o Ramkisan Rajpur (Thakur)
Sau. Sunita W/o Ulhas Pujari
Pushpa W/o Dinanath Belnekar
Ganesh S/o Ramkisan Rajpur (Thakur)
Pramod S/o Ramkisan Rajpur
Sau. Rekha W/o Shivshankar Dudhale
Sau. Madhuri W/o Arun Chawda
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J.M.F.C. Narkhed
Amended Plaint
Amended Plaint
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Amended Plaint |
| 12-03-2026 | Amended Plaint |
| 12-02-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 22-01-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 01-01-2026 | Reply/Say |
Interim Orders
Case Summary In this civil suit (Case No. 56/2017) regarding property dispute heard in Narkhed court on 04-07-2019, the court heard testimony from the plaintiff regarding a land dispute with her husband. The plaintiff claimed her husband forcibly took the disputed land and demanded compensation of Rs. 36,000 for loss of possession. The court's order is set aside (appeal allowed) and the case is remitted back to the lower court for reconsideration and proper adjudication on merits within the stipulated timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary In this civil suit (Case No. 56/2017) regarding property dispute heard in Narkhed court on 04-07-2019, the court heard testimony from the plaintiff regarding a land dispute with her husband. The plaintiff claimed her husband forcibly took the disputed land and demanded compensation of Rs. 36,000 for loss of possession. The court's order is set aside (appeal allowed) and the case is remitted back to the lower court for reconsideration and proper adjudication on merits within the stipulated timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts