Kishor Damodar Rewatkar vs Wasudeo Laxman Rewatkar Advocate - Adv. U. N. Ghorpade — 63/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Suit. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG120009302016
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
94/2016
Filing Date
05-11-2016
Registration No
63/2016
Registration Date
05-11-2016
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kishor Damodar Rewatkar
Adv. Adv. S.M. Nafde
Netram Damodhar Rewatkar
Adv. Adv. S. M. Nafde
Leelabai Damodar Rewatkar
Adv. Adv. S. M. Nafde
Respondent(s)
Wasudeo Laxman Rewatkar Advocate - Adv. U. N. Ghorpade
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 12-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 19-01-2026 | Compliance |
| 08-12-2025 | Compliance |
| 13-10-2025 | Compliance |
Interim Orders
This is a civil suit (Regular Civil Suit No. 63/2016) from a Marathi court involving a property dispute between parties regarding agricultural land and an allegedly forged sale deed. The court recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of witnesses, including testimony from the plaintiff and defendant's wife, who made conflicting statements about a Rs. 55,000 transaction, land ownership since 2002, and allegations of fraudulent documents. The order documents the witness testimonies and their credibility assessments but does not contain a final judgment on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a civil suit (Regular Civil Suit No. 63/2016) from a Marathi court involving a property dispute between parties regarding agricultural land and an allegedly forged sale deed. The court recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of witnesses, including testimony from the plaintiff and defendant's wife, who made conflicting statements about a Rs. 55,000 transaction, land ownership since 2002, and allegations of fraudulent documents. The order documents the witness testimonies and their credibility assessments but does not contain a final judgment on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts