Savita Ramesh Gaydhane vs Ramesh Dasharatrao Gaydhane Advocate - Adv. V. M. Kshirsagar — 157/2016
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22,23. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHNG120009202016
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
816/2016
Filing Date
21-10-2016
Registration No
157/2016
Registration Date
21-10-2016
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
5-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J.M.F.C. Narkhed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Savita Ramesh Gaydhane
Adv. Adv. R. A. Bagde
Respondent(s)
Ramesh Dasharatrao Gaydhane Advocate - Adv. V. M. Kshirsagar
Sulochana Dashrathrao Gaydhane
Jayshri Dashrathrao Gaydhane
Kokila Dashrathrao Gaydhane
Kavita Harish Fating
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J.M.F.C. Narkhed
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-06-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 14-05-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 09-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 14-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 29-01-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 157/2016 Petitioner: Savita Ramesh Gaydhane Respondent: Ramesh Dasharatrao Gaydhane and others This matrimonial dispute involves allegations of cruelty and abandonment. The petitioner filed a case against her husband (Respondent 1) and his family members. The court examined witness testimonies, documentary evidence including hospital records, and affidavits from both parties regarding marital disputes, alleged infidelity, maintenance issues, and separation claims. Order: The court dismissed the petition dated 09-08-2019, finding insufficient evidence to support the petitioner's claims of cruelty as defined under matrimonial law. The court held that the allegations and documentary evidence presented did not meet the legal threshold required to grant relief under the applicable matrimonial statute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 157/2016 Petitioner: Savita Ramesh Gaydhane Respondent: Ramesh Dasharatrao Gaydhane and others This matrimonial dispute involves allegations of cruelty and abandonment. The petitioner filed a case against her husband (Respondent 1) and his family members. The court examined witness testimonies, documentary evidence including hospital records, and affidavits from both parties regarding marital disputes, alleged infidelity, maintenance issues, and separation claims. Order: The court dismissed the petition dated 09-08-2019, finding insufficient evidence to support the petitioner's claims of cruelty as defined under matrimonial law. The court held that the allegations and documentary evidence presented did not meet the legal threshold required to grant relief under the applicable matrimonial statute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts