Sau. Chandrakalabai W/o Wasudeo Barmase vs Shri. Ganesh S/o Daulatrao Chapekar — 25/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE-2. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHNG120008942020

Steps

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

Filing Number

59/2020

Filing Date

07-09-2020

Registration No

25/2020

Registration Date

07-09-2020

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE-2

Petitioner(s)

Sau. Chandrakalabai W/o Wasudeo Barmase

Adv. Adv. B. D. Raut and Adv. B.R. Anvhane

Sau. Maina @ Pushpa W/o Ruprao Wadode

Respondent(s)

Shri. Ganesh S/o Daulatrao Chapekar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

15-04-2026

Steps

14-03-2026

Steps

03-02-2026

Steps

17-12-2025

Evidence

01-11-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

07-09-2020
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Civil Suit No. 25/2020 The plaintiffs' application for ex-parte ad-interim injunction restraining the defendant from creating third-party interests and alienating the suit property was rejected at the interim stage. The court declined to grant the injunction without hearing the defendant, finding it improper to decide the matter without considering both sides and examining the merits. Instead, notice was issued to the defendant calling for his reply on why the injunction should not be granted, with the case adjourned to 21-09-2020 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Civil Suit No. 25/2020 The plaintiffs' application for ex-parte ad-interim injunction restraining the defendant from creating third-party interests and alienating the suit property was rejected at the interim stage. The court declined to grant the injunction without hearing the defendant, finding it improper to decide the matter without considering both sides and examining the merits. Instead, notice was issued to the defendant calling for his reply on why the injunction should not be granted, with the case adjourned to 21-09-2020 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case