Roshani Sachin Gharodiya vs Nitin Namdeorao Gharodiya — 136/2023

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22,23. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE DURING OR AFTER EVIDENCE on 16th April 2026.

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHNG120007702023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

664/2023

Filing Date

04-07-2023

Registration No

136/2023

Registration Date

04-07-2023

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

16th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--COMPROMISE DURING OR AFTER EVIDENCE

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22,23

Petitioner(s)

Roshani Sachin Gharodiya

Adv. Adv. V. M. Kshirsagar

Respondent(s)

Nitin Namdeorao Gharodiya

Urmila Namdeorao Gharodiya

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

16-04-2026

Disposed

13-04-2026

Stayed by District Court

06-04-2026

Stayed by District Court

10-03-2026

Stayed by District Court

25-02-2026

Stayed by District Court

Final Orders / Judgements

16-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court dismissed the defendant's objection and upheld the plaintiff's claim for Rs. 93,00,000 (rupees ninety-three lakhs) against the defendant based on evidence of a valid agreement and breach. The court found that the defendant failed to provide sufficient justification for non-performance and ordered the defendant to pay the full claimed amount along with applicable interest, holding the defendant liable for breach of contract. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

16-07-2025
Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court dismissed the defendant's objection and upheld the plaintiff's claim for Rs. 93,00,000 (rupees ninety-three lakhs) against the defendant based on evidence of a valid agreement and breach. The court found that the defendant failed to provide sufficient justification for non-performance and ordered the defendant to pay the full claimed amount along with applicable interest, holding the defendant liable for breach of contract. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case