Vilas Gulab Gaydhane vs Ashok Pundlik Gaydhane — 32/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Written Statement Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHNG120007482024

Filing Number

282/2024

Filing Date

30-Apr-2024

Registration No

32/2024

Registration Date

30-Apr-2024

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vilas Gulab Gaydhane

    Adv. Adv. M. R. Charde

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ashok Pundlik Gaydhane

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  5. 14-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  6. 02-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  7. 11-Nov-2025

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  8. 24-Sep-2025

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  9. 20-Aug-2025

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  10. 18-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  11. 24-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  12. 10-May-2025

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  13. 29-Apr-2025

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  14. 28-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  15. 20-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  16. 07-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  17. 14-Dec-2024

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  18. 08-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  19. 28-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  20. 29-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  21. 27-Jul-2024

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  22. 11-Jul-2024

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  23. 13-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  24. 09-May-2024

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  25. 03-May-2024

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  26. 30-Apr-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: In Civil Suit No. 32/2024 (Vilas v. Ashok), the court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff on April 30, 2024. The defendant was directed to maintain status quo on the disputed property until May 3, 2024, after he allegedly demolished the joint boundary wall and attempted to encroach approximately 4 feet of the plaintiff's land without permission. The court found prima facie evidence of illegal construction and property encroachment, warranting urgent relief to prevent irreparable loss to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  27. 30-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 30-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 32/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Civil Suit No. 32/2024 (Vilas v. Ashok), the court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff on April 30, 2024. The defendant was directed to maintain status quo on the disputed property until May 3, 2024, after he allegedly demolished the joint boundary wall and attempted to encroach approximately 4 feet of the plaintiff's land without permission. The court found prima facie evidence of illegal construction and property encroachment, warranting urgent relief to prevent irreparable loss to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case