State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Ravindra Keshav Revatkar — 412/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120005902026
e-Filing Number
13-03-2026
Filing Number
518/2026
Filing Date
13-Mar-2026
Registration No
412/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Decision Date
09-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
168
Police Station
P.S.Narkhed
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ravindra Keshav Revatkar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 412/2026 Ravindra Keshav Rewatkar, age 25, was charged under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 for an offence committed on 28/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after understanding the charges in Marathi. The court convicted him and imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine (or 3 days simple imprisonment in default) considering his poverty, lack of criminal antecedents, and the nature of the offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-May-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
14-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 412/2026
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 412/2026 Ravindra Keshav Rewatkar, age 25, was charged under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 for an offence committed on 28/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after understanding the charges in Marathi. The court convicted him and imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine (or 3 days simple imprisonment in default) considering his poverty, lack of criminal antecedents, and the nature of the offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts