State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Dashrath Baraku Pathe — 411/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120005892026

e-Filing Number

13-03-2026

Filing Number

517/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

411/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

179

Police Station

P.S.Narkhed

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84

Petitioner(s)

1.State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed

Respondent(s)

1.Dashrath Baraku Pathe

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Case 411/2026 Summary: Dashrath Barku Pathe, a 62-year-old laborer, was convicted under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 for an offense on 02/03/2026. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after being explained the charges in Marathi. Considering his financial hardship, lack of criminal antecedents, and the nature of the offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine or 3 days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
13-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
13-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 411/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 411/2026 Summary: Dashrath Barku Pathe, a 62-year-old laborer, was convicted under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 for an offense on 02/03/2026. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after being explained the charges in Marathi. Considering his financial hardship, lack of criminal antecedents, and the nature of the offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine or 3 days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.