State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Shubham Manohar Hivase — 409/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120005802026

e-Filing Number

12-03-2026

Filing Number

513/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

409/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

172

Police Station

P.S.Narkhed

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84

Petitioner(s)

1.State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed

Respondent(s)

1.Shubham Manohar Hivase

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Case 409/2026 Summary: Shubham Manohar Hivase, age 29, was convicted under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 for an offense committed on 28/02/2026. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Narkhed. Considering his clean criminal record, financial hardship, and voluntary guilty plea, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine, with 3 days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
12-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
12-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 409/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 409/2026 Summary: Shubham Manohar Hivase, age 29, was convicted under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 for an offense committed on 28/02/2026. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Narkhed. Considering his clean criminal record, financial hardship, and voluntary guilty plea, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine, with 3 days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.